How should a researcher assess the risks of a web-based survey on sensitive topics?

Evaluating both the magnitude and probability of harm is essential when assessing the risks of a web-based survey on sensitive topics. This approach allows researchers to understand not just how severe any potential harm could be if it occurs (magnitude), but also how likely it is that such harm might happen (probability).

In the context of sensitive topics, participants may be at risk for emotional distress or other negative outcomes due to the nature of the questions posed. By assessing both dimensions, researchers can develop informed strategies to mitigate those risks, such as providing appropriate resources, ensuring confidentiality, and adopting ethical guidelines that prioritize participant safety.

Considering participant demographics alone does not encompass the complexity of risk factors involved in sensitive research. Ignoring potential impacts on participants is contrary to ethical research practices, as it overlooks the responsibility to protect individuals’ welfare. Relying solely on non-expert opinions fails to draw upon necessary empirical knowledge and ethical standards that are crucial in evaluating risks appropriately. Thus, a comprehensive assessment involving both the magnitude and probability of harm is the most reliable and responsible approach for researchers conducting surveys on sensitive topics.