If a study participant on a taper-down regimen is admitted to prison, how should the researcher respond?

Prepare for the CITI Program HSR Social and Behavioral Education (SBE) Exam with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready to excel in your certification!

When a study participant on a taper-down regimen is admitted to prison, the appropriate response from the researcher is to contact prison authorities about the medical issue and report to the Institutional Review Board (IRB). This course of action is essential because the researcher's priority is to ensure the well-being of the participant while adhering to ethical guidelines and the regulations established by the IRB.

By contacting prison authorities, the researcher can communicate the participant's medical needs and ensure they receive the necessary care and treatment while incarcerated. It's also vital to report to the IRB as this situation may impact the participant's ability to continue in the study, and the IRB should be informed to evaluate any necessary adjustments to the research protocol or participant consent.

Taking these steps helps protect the rights and safety of the participant, addresses their health needs while incarcerated, and maintains compliance with ethical research standards. This approach reflects the responsibility researchers have to manage participant welfare and uphold ethical research practices even in complex situations like incarceration.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy