What is an example of exculpatory language in informed consent?

Exculpatory language in informed consent refers to wording that seeks to absolve the researcher or institution from liability, specifically regarding any potential harm or injury that may result from participation in research. The phrase indicating that a participant waives the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries is a direct example of this type of language. It implies that by agreeing to participate, individuals cannot hold the researchers accountable for any adverse effects that arise, thus limiting their legal rights.

The other options focus on different aspects of the informed consent process. For instance, stating that participation is voluntary and can be withdrawn at any time emphasizes the participant's autonomy and right to make informed choices, aligning with ethical standards in research. Similarly, conveying that outcomes of the study will be shared with participants and that they will receive compensation for participation are examples of positive assurances meant to inform and encourage participation, rather than absolve liability. Hence, while all these statements play important roles in informed consent, the one that illustrates exculpatory language is the one that waives legal rights.