What is the appropriate action for an IRB regarding a student's research involving prison populations conscripted by a family friend?

The appropriate action for an Institutional Review Board (IRB) in this scenario is to not approve the project, as prisoners are considered a vulnerable population, particularly when the research involves individuals conscripted by a family friend. Conducting research with prisoners requires careful ethical consideration due to their limited autonomy and potential coercion in a research setting, especially when a family connection is involved. The IRB's role is to protect participants from potential exploitation or undue influence, and this situation raises significant concerns about the validity of consent and the potential for coercion, which justifies a decision against approval.

Additionally, because this population is inherently vulnerable, it is crucial for the IRB to ensure that any proposed research does not take undue advantage of their circumstances. The IRB must prioritize the safety and rights of participants before considerations of convenience, ensuring that ethical research practices are upheld.